Engineering
GitHub PR and DevOps change risk
Put deterministic change-risk findings and a pass or block decision in the pull-request workflow.
AntOps analyses bounded changed static content; deterministic findings and policy evaluation are authoritative. AI is not presented as the source of truth.
Who this is for
Engineering, platform and security teams reviewing repository changes.
The problem
Make deterministic change evidence and policy decisions visible before merge, not after delivery.
What AntOps monitors or analyses
OpenAPI breaking changes, dependencies, SBOM and OSV deltas
GitHub Actions permissions and action-pin checks
Secrets, containers, base images, Docker and Terraform
Policies, waivers and GitHub Check Runs
How it works
- 01Pull request or changed files
- 02Deterministic analysis
- 03Findings
- 04Policy evaluation
- 05Pass or block evidence
What you receive
Structured findings
Policy decision and risk level
Durable assessment and waiver history
GitHub Check Run evidence
Example workflow
Scope and limitations
- AntOps does not clone, execute or shell out to submitted content.
- Findings are static risk evidence, not a guarantee that software is secure.
Powered by DevOps Change Risk
Explore the related productQuestions
Does AntOps execute my code?
No. It analyses bounded submitted text and static files only.
Is AI the decision maker?
No. Deterministic findings and policy evaluation provide the decision evidence.